Objective To evaluate the incidence of side-effects of oral and intravesical oxybutynin chloride in children with meningomyelocele (MMC) and a neurogenic bladder. Patients and methods The study comprised 225 children with a neurogenic bladder from MMC who were evaluated with urodynamic testing and voiding cystourethrography to identify those at high risk of upper tract damage. In all, 101 children (mean age 4.2 years, range 0.25-10) had unco-ordinated detrusor-sphincter function and low compliance: they were treated with either oral or intravesical oxybutynin and clean intermittent catheterization. Results Of the 101 patients, 67 were treated with oral oxybutynin: in 11 the treatment was discontinued because of the side-effects. The other 34 patients used both clean intermittent catheterization and intravesical oxybutynin. In this group there were side-effects in six patients, including drowsiness, hallucinations and cognitive changes. Conclusions Oral and intravesical oxybutynin is effective for managing neurogenic bladder dysfunction, but intravesical administration is safer and better tolerated than oral oxybutynin in the treatment of children with MMC. However, adverse effects such as cognitive impairment can also occur in children treated with intravesical oxybutynin and these patients must be closely monitored because these effects may differ from those with oral administration.

Side-effects of oral or intravesical oxybutynin chloride in children with spina bifida

Ferrara P;
2001-01-01

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the incidence of side-effects of oral and intravesical oxybutynin chloride in children with meningomyelocele (MMC) and a neurogenic bladder. Patients and methods The study comprised 225 children with a neurogenic bladder from MMC who were evaluated with urodynamic testing and voiding cystourethrography to identify those at high risk of upper tract damage. In all, 101 children (mean age 4.2 years, range 0.25-10) had unco-ordinated detrusor-sphincter function and low compliance: they were treated with either oral or intravesical oxybutynin and clean intermittent catheterization. Results Of the 101 patients, 67 were treated with oral oxybutynin: in 11 the treatment was discontinued because of the side-effects. The other 34 patients used both clean intermittent catheterization and intravesical oxybutynin. In this group there were side-effects in six patients, including drowsiness, hallucinations and cognitive changes. Conclusions Oral and intravesical oxybutynin is effective for managing neurogenic bladder dysfunction, but intravesical administration is safer and better tolerated than oral oxybutynin in the treatment of children with MMC. However, adverse effects such as cognitive impairment can also occur in children treated with intravesical oxybutynin and these patients must be closely monitored because these effects may differ from those with oral administration.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/6307
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact