Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
Background: The oncologic safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer has recently been questioned, with high local recurrence (LR) rates reported in Dutch and Norwegian experiences. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oncologic safety of TaTME in a large cohort of patients with primary rectal cancer, primarily in terms of LR, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective international registry cohort study, including all patients who underwent TaTME for primary rectal adenocarcinoma from February 2010 through December 2018. The main endpoints were 2-year LR rate, pattern of LR, and independent risk factors for LR. Secondary endpoints included 2-year DFS and OS rates. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate actuarial LR, DFS, and OS rates. Results: A total of 2,803 patients receiving primary TaTME were included, predominantly men (71%) with a median age of 65 years (interquartile ratio, 57-73 years). After a median followup of 24 months (interquartile ratio, 12-38 months), the 2-year LR rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.8%-5.8%) with a unifocal LR pattern in 99 of 103 patients (96%). Independent risk factors for LR were male sex, threatened resection margin on baseline MRI, pathologic stage III cancer, and a positive circumferential resection margin on final histopathology. The 2-year DFS and OS rates were 77% (95% CI, 75%-79%) and 92% (95% CI, 91%-93%), respectively. Conclusions: This largest TaTME cohort to date supports the oncologic safety of the TaTME technique for rectal cancer in patients treated in units that contributed to an international registry, with an acceptable 2-year LR rate and a predominantly unifocal LR pattern.
Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry
Roodbeen, Sapho X;Penna, Marta;van Dieren, Susan;Moran, Brendan;Tekkis, Paris;Tanis, Pieter J;Hompes, Roel;Michel Adamina;Felix Aignerm;Hazar Al Furajii;Alberto Arezzo;Steven J Arnold;Kamal Aryal;Ralph Austin;Oliver Baekkelund;Ioannis Baloyiannis;Dibyendu Bandyopadhyay;Balazs Banky;Giuliano Barugola;Eloy Espin Basany;Eric H J Belgers;Stephen Bell;Willem Bemelman;Stefano Berti;Matthias Biebl;Bobby Bloemendaal;Luigi Boni;Robbert J I Bosker;Benjamin Box;Carl Brown;Lukas Bruegger;Walter Brunner;Christian Buchli;Ronan Cahill;Juan Pablo Campana;Fransesca di Candido;Gabriella Teresa Capolupo;Marco Caricato;Aleidis Caro-Tarragó;Massimiliano Casati;Elisa Cassinotti;Michael Chadwick;Praminthra Chitsabesan;Dimitri Christoforidis;Emile Coetzee;Julien Coget;Pablo Collera;Edward Courtney;Chris Cunningham;Francois Dagbert;Stephen J Dalton;Marta Pascual Damieta;Giovanni Dapri;Sanjeev Dayal;Nicolo de Manzini;Karl de Pooter;Borja DeLacy;Salvadora Delgado;Dobromir Dimitrov;Sarah Duff;Khasan Erkinovich Dzhumabaev;Tom Edwards;Monika Egenvall;Lope Estevez-Schwarz;Arne E Færden;Seraina Faes;Cosimo Feleppa;Alessandro Ferrero;Havard Forsmo;Christiano Denoni Freitas;Alice Frontali;Bawantha Gamage;Luis J García-Florez;Daniel Geissmann;Markus Glöckller;Severin Gloor;Tomas Grolich;Dieter Hahnloser;Athur Harikrishnan;Hiro Hasegawa;Ingrid Haunold;Maria Fernandez Hevia;Jeroen Hol;James Horwood;Roshan Ial;Masaaki Ito;Guilherme Pagin São Julião;Martin Karamanliev;Shane Killeen;Werner Kneist;Siu Yan Kok;Stephan Korsgen;Miranda Kusters;Antonio la Terra;Antonio Lacy;Lorand Lakatos;Jan R Lambrecht;Sigmund Lavik;Larence Lee;Sender A Liberman;Laura Lorenzon;Paul Mackey;Zaman Zaur Mamedli;Tobias Marcy;Tohmeh Maroon;Lukas Marti;Paolo Massucco;Adrián Ezequiel Mattacheo;Iain McCallum;Jeremy Meyer;Antonios Michalopoulos;Saulius Mikalauskas;Yevgen Miroshnychenko;Christof Mitermair;Tim Moore;Barbara Mooslechner;Mario Morino;C Muñoz;Andrea Muratore;Ventsislav Metodiev Mutafchiyski;Alistair Myers;Joaquim Navarro;Deborah Nicol;Daisuke Nishizaki;Gregory John Nolan;Alex Ochsner;Jae Hwan Oh;Edoardo Osenda;Susana Ourô;Yves Panis;Theodosios Papavramidis;Marius Paraoan;Carlos Pastor;Cherylin Fu Wan Pei;Dimitar Penchev;Miguel Pera;Sharaf Perdawood;Rodrigo Oliva Perez;Roberto Persiani;Frank Pfeffer;P. Terry Phang;Eligijus Poskus;Frederic Ris;Timothy Alexander Rockall;Juan Manuel Romero-Marcos;Paulo Roquete;Gustavo Rossi;Giacomo Ruffo;Marcos Gomez Ruiz;Jayesh Sagar;Yoshiharu Sakai;Lorena Sanchon;Andrea Scala;Dennis Schaap;Monica Millan Scheiding;Marcello Schiavo;Eduardo Miguel Schmidt;Gustavo Sevá-Pereira;Raffaella Sguinzi;Mostafa Shalaby;Abhiram Sharma;Gurjar Shashank;Colin Sietses;Pierpaolo Sileri;Alistair Slesser;Dae Kyung Sohn;Alejandro Solis-Peña;Claudio Soravia;Meindert M N Sosef;Antonino Spinelli;P Storms;Peter Studer;Erik Syk;Aaldert Konraad Talsma;Patricia Tejedor;Sara Temple;Joaquín Tognelli;Weihua Tong;Jared Torkington;Jean-Jacques Tuech;George Tzovaras;Dirk Van de Putte;Yves van Nieuwenhove;Michael von Papen;Stephan Vorburger;Quan Wang;Satish Warrier;Helmut Weiss;Jacques-Alain Witzig;Torsten Wolff;Greg Wynn;Urs Zingg
2021-01-01
Abstract
Background: The oncologic safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer has recently been questioned, with high local recurrence (LR) rates reported in Dutch and Norwegian experiences. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oncologic safety of TaTME in a large cohort of patients with primary rectal cancer, primarily in terms of LR, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective international registry cohort study, including all patients who underwent TaTME for primary rectal adenocarcinoma from February 2010 through December 2018. The main endpoints were 2-year LR rate, pattern of LR, and independent risk factors for LR. Secondary endpoints included 2-year DFS and OS rates. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate actuarial LR, DFS, and OS rates. Results: A total of 2,803 patients receiving primary TaTME were included, predominantly men (71%) with a median age of 65 years (interquartile ratio, 57-73 years). After a median followup of 24 months (interquartile ratio, 12-38 months), the 2-year LR rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.8%-5.8%) with a unifocal LR pattern in 99 of 103 patients (96%). Independent risk factors for LR were male sex, threatened resection margin on baseline MRI, pathologic stage III cancer, and a positive circumferential resection margin on final histopathology. The 2-year DFS and OS rates were 77% (95% CI, 75%-79%) and 92% (95% CI, 91%-93%), respectively. Conclusions: This largest TaTME cohort to date supports the oncologic safety of the TaTME technique for rectal cancer in patients treated in units that contributed to an international registry, with an acceptable 2-year LR rate and a predominantly unifocal LR pattern.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/76144
Citazioni
7
35
24
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.