Accurate measurement of internal/external rotation joint angle is critical in assessing the shoulder function, especially in the clinical practice as it plays a key role in evaluating activities of daily living and monitoring the rehabilitation progress. This study analyzed the effectiveness of using a marker cluster placed over the proximal epiphysis of the ulna to measure humeral axial rotation with respect to the thorax, comparing it with the traditional method that uses a cluster placed on the upper arm. Data were collected simultaneously using the proposed indirect approach and a conventional marker cluster to analyze three internal/external rotations performed in the Ski-Pose, frontal, and sagittal plane. Linear regressions for time series comparison reported a coefficient of determination R-2 > 0.9919 in all tasks. The linear coefficients (a(1)) were as follows: Ski-Pose (a(1) = 0.64 +/- 0.10), frontal plane (a(1) = 0.74 +/- 0.05), and sagittal plane (a(1) = 0.73 +/- 0.04). Three additional planar tasks were recorded for concurrent validity and RMSE was reported for the main joint angle, obtaining a maximum of 3.87 degrees for the pure flexion/extension task and 1.94 degrees for the abduction/adduction task. A forearm pronation/supination task without axial rotation yielded a maximum error standard deviation of 2.64 degrees. Proximal ulna tracking showed a statistically higher maximum range of motion than humeral tracking in pure axial rotation tasks. This indirect tracking approach is a promising alternative to the traditional cluster technique due to its reduced sensitivity to soft tissue artifacts.

Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster

Longo U. G.
;
Carnevale A.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Accurate measurement of internal/external rotation joint angle is critical in assessing the shoulder function, especially in the clinical practice as it plays a key role in evaluating activities of daily living and monitoring the rehabilitation progress. This study analyzed the effectiveness of using a marker cluster placed over the proximal epiphysis of the ulna to measure humeral axial rotation with respect to the thorax, comparing it with the traditional method that uses a cluster placed on the upper arm. Data were collected simultaneously using the proposed indirect approach and a conventional marker cluster to analyze three internal/external rotations performed in the Ski-Pose, frontal, and sagittal plane. Linear regressions for time series comparison reported a coefficient of determination R-2 > 0.9919 in all tasks. The linear coefficients (a(1)) were as follows: Ski-Pose (a(1) = 0.64 +/- 0.10), frontal plane (a(1) = 0.74 +/- 0.05), and sagittal plane (a(1) = 0.73 +/- 0.04). Three additional planar tasks were recorded for concurrent validity and RMSE was reported for the main joint angle, obtaining a maximum of 3.87 degrees for the pure flexion/extension task and 1.94 degrees for the abduction/adduction task. A forearm pronation/supination task without axial rotation yielded a maximum error standard deviation of 2.64 degrees. Proximal ulna tracking showed a statistically higher maximum range of motion than humeral tracking in pure axial rotation tasks. This indirect tracking approach is a promising alternative to the traditional cluster technique due to its reduced sensitivity to soft tissue artifacts.
2025
Axial Rotation; Internal/External Rotation; Kinematics; Proximal Ulna tracking; Shoulder
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/91350
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact