E-noses provide potential non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary diseases. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of a modern breath sampling system (Pneumopipe (R) plus an array of e-nose sensors) in asthmatic and healthy children. The secondary aim was to compare the repeatability of the breath sampling system, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). Fifteen children (age 6-11 years) with asthma and thirty healthy children matched by age and gender (1: 2 allocation) were recruited; of them, three healthy children did not complete the study. All measurements were collected twice during the baseline visit, 30 min apart, and once during the final visit, after 7 d. Repeatability was assessed through the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and a significance test was performed to detect an at least 'fair' repeatability (ICC > 0.2). In asthmatic children, the within-day (0-30 min) ICCs for e-nose sensors (8 sensors x 4 desorption temperatures) ranged from 0.24 to 0.84 (median 0.57, IQR 0.47-0.71), while the between-day (0-7d) ICCs ranged from 0.25 to 0.83 (median 0.66, IQR 0.55-0.72). In healthy children, the within-day ICCs for e-nose sensors ranged from 0.29 to 0.85 (median 0.58, IQR 0.49-0.63), while the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.33 to 0.82 (median 0.55, IQR 0.49-0.63). In both groups, most of the within-day and between-day ICCs for e-nose sensors were statistically significant. Moreover, the within-day and between-day ICCs for all spirometry parameters andeNO were significant and similar to those of the most reliable sensors. The modern breath sampling system showed more than acceptable within-day and between-day repeatability, in both asthmatic and healthy children.

E-noses provide potential non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary diseases. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of a modern breath sampling system (Pneumopipe® plus an array of e-nose sensors) in asthmatic and healthy children. The secondary aim was to compare the repeatability of the breath sampling system, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). Fifteen children (age 6-11 years) with asthma and thirty healthy children matched by age and gender (1:2 allocation) were recruited; of them, three healthy children did not complete the study. All measurements were collected twice during the baseline visit, 30 min apart, and once during the final visit, after 7 d. Repeatability was assessed through the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and a significance test was performed to detect an at least 'fair' repeatability (ICC > 0.2). In asthmatic children, the within-day (0-30 min) ICCs for e-nose sensors (8 sensors × 4 desorption temperatures) ranged from 0.24 to 0.84 (median 0.57, IQR 0.47-0.71), while the between-day (0-7 d) ICCs ranged from 0.25 to 0.83 (median 0.66, IQR 0.55-0.72). In healthy children, the within-day ICCs for e-nose sensors ranged from 0.29 to 0.85 (median 0.58, IQR 0.49-0.63), while the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.33 to 0.82 (median 0.55, IQR 0.49-0.63). In both groups, most of the within-day and between-day ICCs for e-nose sensors were statistically significant. Moreover, the within-day and between-day ICCs for all spirometry parameters and eNO were significant and similar to those of the most reliable sensors. The modern breath sampling system showed more than acceptable within-day and between-day repeatability, in both asthmatic and healthy children. The present study was registered on the central registration system ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03025061).

Repeatability of exhaled breath fingerprint collected by a modern sampling system in asthmatic and healthy children

Sabatini A.;Santonico M;Zompanti A.;Antonelli Incalzi R.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

E-noses provide potential non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary diseases. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of a modern breath sampling system (Pneumopipe® plus an array of e-nose sensors) in asthmatic and healthy children. The secondary aim was to compare the repeatability of the breath sampling system, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). Fifteen children (age 6-11 years) with asthma and thirty healthy children matched by age and gender (1:2 allocation) were recruited; of them, three healthy children did not complete the study. All measurements were collected twice during the baseline visit, 30 min apart, and once during the final visit, after 7 d. Repeatability was assessed through the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and a significance test was performed to detect an at least 'fair' repeatability (ICC > 0.2). In asthmatic children, the within-day (0-30 min) ICCs for e-nose sensors (8 sensors × 4 desorption temperatures) ranged from 0.24 to 0.84 (median 0.57, IQR 0.47-0.71), while the between-day (0-7 d) ICCs ranged from 0.25 to 0.83 (median 0.66, IQR 0.55-0.72). In healthy children, the within-day ICCs for e-nose sensors ranged from 0.29 to 0.85 (median 0.58, IQR 0.49-0.63), while the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.33 to 0.82 (median 0.55, IQR 0.49-0.63). In both groups, most of the within-day and between-day ICCs for e-nose sensors were statistically significant. Moreover, the within-day and between-day ICCs for all spirometry parameters and eNO were significant and similar to those of the most reliable sensors. The modern breath sampling system showed more than acceptable within-day and between-day repeatability, in both asthmatic and healthy children. The present study was registered on the central registration system ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03025061).
2019
E-noses provide potential non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary diseases. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of a modern breath sampling system (Pneumopipe (R) plus an array of e-nose sensors) in asthmatic and healthy children. The secondary aim was to compare the repeatability of the breath sampling system, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). Fifteen children (age 6-11 years) with asthma and thirty healthy children matched by age and gender (1: 2 allocation) were recruited; of them, three healthy children did not complete the study. All measurements were collected twice during the baseline visit, 30 min apart, and once during the final visit, after 7 d. Repeatability was assessed through the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and a significance test was performed to detect an at least 'fair' repeatability (ICC > 0.2). In asthmatic children, the within-day (0-30 min) ICCs for e-nose sensors (8 sensors x 4 desorption temperatures) ranged from 0.24 to 0.84 (median 0.57, IQR 0.47-0.71), while the between-day (0-7d) ICCs ranged from 0.25 to 0.83 (median 0.66, IQR 0.55-0.72). In healthy children, the within-day ICCs for e-nose sensors ranged from 0.29 to 0.85 (median 0.58, IQR 0.49-0.63), while the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.33 to 0.82 (median 0.55, IQR 0.49-0.63). In both groups, most of the within-day and between-day ICCs for e-nose sensors were statistically significant. Moreover, the within-day and between-day ICCs for all spirometry parameters andeNO were significant and similar to those of the most reliable sensors. The modern breath sampling system showed more than acceptable within-day and between-day repeatability, in both asthmatic and healthy children.
Asthma, children, e-nose, exhaled nitric oxide, repeatability, spirometry
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/939
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact