Background: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) remain a serious complication of colorectal surgery, causing a significant financial burden to the health care system. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of an O-ring retractor can be effective in preventing the incidence of wound infections after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective case-control study from January 2014 to June 2018 was performed. Data were analyzed from a retrospective colorectal database. SSI was defined according to criteria published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and analyzed as a primary outcome. Results: Three hundred twelve consecutive patients (n = 312) were enrolled in our study. Among them, 158 patients (Group A) in which an O-ring retractor device was used during surgery was compared with a control group of 154 patients (Group B) in which an O-ring retractor device was not used. Primary outcome was to determine SSIs rates among the 2 groups. No statistically differences were observed with regard to baseline characteristics between both groups. A total of 9 patients (5.69%) and 24 (15.58%) with SSIs were identified in Group A and B, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14 – 0.72; P = .0045). The median postoperative hospital stay length was 6.7 days in group A and 7.6 days in group B (P ≤ .05). Conclusions: SSIs infections rates were significantly higher in patients in which an O-ring retractor device was not used. This study suggests that the use of a wound protector device can be considered for routine use in elective colorectal surgery
O-ring protector in prevention of SSIs in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Capolupo GT;Angeletti S;Ciccozzi M;Coppola R;Caricato M
2019-01-01
Abstract
Background: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) remain a serious complication of colorectal surgery, causing a significant financial burden to the health care system. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of an O-ring retractor can be effective in preventing the incidence of wound infections after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective case-control study from January 2014 to June 2018 was performed. Data were analyzed from a retrospective colorectal database. SSI was defined according to criteria published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and analyzed as a primary outcome. Results: Three hundred twelve consecutive patients (n = 312) were enrolled in our study. Among them, 158 patients (Group A) in which an O-ring retractor device was used during surgery was compared with a control group of 154 patients (Group B) in which an O-ring retractor device was not used. Primary outcome was to determine SSIs rates among the 2 groups. No statistically differences were observed with regard to baseline characteristics between both groups. A total of 9 patients (5.69%) and 24 (15.58%) with SSIs were identified in Group A and B, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14 – 0.72; P = .0045). The median postoperative hospital stay length was 6.7 days in group A and 7.6 days in group B (P ≤ .05). Conclusions: SSIs infections rates were significantly higher in patients in which an O-ring retractor device was not used. This study suggests that the use of a wound protector device can be considered for routine use in elective colorectal surgery| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 
									
										
										
										
										
											
												
												
												    
												
											
										
									
									
										
										
											2019 J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surg.pdf
										
																				
									
										
											 non disponibili 
											Tipologia:
											Altro materiale allegato
										 
									
									
									
									
										
											Licenza:
											
											
												Non specificato
												
												
												
											
										 
									
									
										Dimensione
										469.98 kB
									 
									
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 
										
										
								 | 
								469.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia | 
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


