BACKGROUND: This ongoing study is a prospective evaluation of immediately preoperative video-laparoscopy compared to ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT) staging for gastric cancer. An analysis of the first 70 cases is reported. METHODS: TNM staging is used to compare the US/CT findings and the laparoscopic findings with the gold standard for pathologic findings in resected specimens. RESULTS: In our series 47 out of 70 cases are locally advanced cancers (stages III and IV): In this subset the predictive value of laparoscopic staging is 86.4%. Laparoscopy shows an overall staging accuracy of 68.6%, compared to 32.8% for US/CT. The difference is statistically significant as regards the T factor (T3: 69.7% vs 12. 1%, p < 0.002; T4: 84.2% vs 42.1%, p < 0.05); as regards the M factor, laparoscopy appears the most specific method for detecting peritoneal seeding. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure plays a crucial role in determining the resectability of the tumor, thus avoiding unnecessary laparotomies. A meticulous staging becomes mandatory when applying modem treatment options (e.g., neo-adjuvant chemotherapy) to locally advanced cancers; in this context the use of staging laparoscopy will have a relevant impact on future treatment

Immediately preoperative laparoscopic staging for gastric cancer

Coppola R;
1996-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This ongoing study is a prospective evaluation of immediately preoperative video-laparoscopy compared to ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT) staging for gastric cancer. An analysis of the first 70 cases is reported. METHODS: TNM staging is used to compare the US/CT findings and the laparoscopic findings with the gold standard for pathologic findings in resected specimens. RESULTS: In our series 47 out of 70 cases are locally advanced cancers (stages III and IV): In this subset the predictive value of laparoscopic staging is 86.4%. Laparoscopy shows an overall staging accuracy of 68.6%, compared to 32.8% for US/CT. The difference is statistically significant as regards the T factor (T3: 69.7% vs 12. 1%, p < 0.002; T4: 84.2% vs 42.1%, p < 0.05); as regards the M factor, laparoscopy appears the most specific method for detecting peritoneal seeding. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure plays a crucial role in determining the resectability of the tumor, thus avoiding unnecessary laparotomies. A meticulous staging becomes mandatory when applying modem treatment options (e.g., neo-adjuvant chemotherapy) to locally advanced cancers; in this context the use of staging laparoscopy will have a relevant impact on future treatment
1996
gastrict cancer; staging; laparoscopic
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/9472
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact