Pharmacological differences and switching among anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A narrative review

Antibodies targeting either the calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP), such as galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, or the receptor (erenumab) have been approved for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Although widely used and generally effective, a proportion of patients discontinue treatment due to lack of efficacy. In both randomized controlled trials and observational studies, all anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have consistently demonstrated comparable efficacy and tolerability, suggesting a pharmacological class effect. However, differences in therapeutic targets, structure, and pharmacokinetic characteristics may influence their efficacy and safety differently. Therefore, in patients not achieving a clinically meaningful response with one anti-CGRP antibody, switching to a different antibody may be a viable option. This review examines the pharmacological characteristics and distinctions among anti-CGRP mAbs, highlighting their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, along with the clinical observational data of switching. Finally, we summarize suggestions from international guidelines.