PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate differences in marginal bone loss (MBL) between bone level (BL) implants with laser-microgrooved collar surface (LMS) and without laser-microgrooved collar surface (noLMS), restored with screw-retained single crowns with different emergence profiles (EPs) and emergence angles (EAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of records and radiographs of 90 patients scheduled for single-implant therapy at the molar region over a period of up to 10 years after prosthetic restoration was performed. The radiographic MBL and clinical parameters were measured over time and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: LMS implants presented a statistically significant higher cumulative success rate (97.7% vs 91.1%; P < .05) and lower mean MBL (0.8 vs 1.7 mm; P < .05) compared to noLMS. Around noLMS BL implants, an EA ≤ 30 degrees (P < .05) and a concave EP (P < .05) showed a statistically significant correlation with reduced radiographic MBL. Around LMS BL implants, no statistically significant differences were found between different EAs or EPs. CONCLUSIONS: Different EAs and EPs have not been found to influence MBL in BL LMS implants. noMLS implants restored with a narrow EA ≤ 30 degrees and a concave EP were associated with significantly less MBL over time.

Influence of Prosthetic Emergence Profiles and Emergence Angles on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Surface: A Retrospective Study

Testarelli L.
Supervision
2026-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate differences in marginal bone loss (MBL) between bone level (BL) implants with laser-microgrooved collar surface (LMS) and without laser-microgrooved collar surface (noLMS), restored with screw-retained single crowns with different emergence profiles (EPs) and emergence angles (EAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of records and radiographs of 90 patients scheduled for single-implant therapy at the molar region over a period of up to 10 years after prosthetic restoration was performed. The radiographic MBL and clinical parameters were measured over time and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: LMS implants presented a statistically significant higher cumulative success rate (97.7% vs 91.1%; P < .05) and lower mean MBL (0.8 vs 1.7 mm; P < .05) compared to noLMS. Around noLMS BL implants, an EA ≤ 30 degrees (P < .05) and a concave EP (P < .05) showed a statistically significant correlation with reduced radiographic MBL. Around LMS BL implants, no statistically significant differences were found between different EAs or EPs. CONCLUSIONS: Different EAs and EPs have not been found to influence MBL in BL LMS implants. noMLS implants restored with a narrow EA ≤ 30 degrees and a concave EP were associated with significantly less MBL over time.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/96304
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact