AimTo date, there is no consensus on which set of variables should be used to identify older persons at risk of disability in activities of daily living. The present study aimed to: (i) evaluate how different deficits cluster in a population of community-dwelling older persons; and (ii) investigate whether the discriminative capacity of physical performance measures towards the development of disability might be improved by adding psychological, social and environmental indicators. MethodsData are from 709 non-disabled older persons participating in the Invecchiare in Chianti study. We carried out a cluster analysis of 12 deficits in multiple functional domains, selected from the available frailty assessment instruments. Then, participants were assigned to a group, based on the obtained clusters of variables. For each group, we measured the prognostic capacity and the predictive ability for 6-year disability. ResultsThe analysis showed a physical cluster (including weight loss, reduced grip strength/gait speed/physical activity, impaired balance, environmental barriers) and a psychosocial cluster (e.g. living alone, depression, low income). Thus, participants were classified into four groups according to the presence of a physical and/or psychosocial cluster. Compared with the fit group, the relative risks of becoming disabled in the physical, psychosocial and mixed deficit groups were 2.23 (95% CI 0.71-7.00), 1.52 (95% CI 0.62-3.75) and 6.37 (95% CI 2.83-14.33), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for the physical, psychosocial and mixed deficit groups were, respectively, 9% and 87%, 6% and 83%, and 27% and 94%. ConclusionsAs expected, physical and psychosocial deficits cluster predominantly into different groups. Even when both are considered simultaneously, the ability to predict incident disability is still insufficient. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 685-691

Clusters of functional domains to identify older persons at risk of disability

Pedone C;Antonelli Incalzi R
2018-01-01

Abstract

AimTo date, there is no consensus on which set of variables should be used to identify older persons at risk of disability in activities of daily living. The present study aimed to: (i) evaluate how different deficits cluster in a population of community-dwelling older persons; and (ii) investigate whether the discriminative capacity of physical performance measures towards the development of disability might be improved by adding psychological, social and environmental indicators. MethodsData are from 709 non-disabled older persons participating in the Invecchiare in Chianti study. We carried out a cluster analysis of 12 deficits in multiple functional domains, selected from the available frailty assessment instruments. Then, participants were assigned to a group, based on the obtained clusters of variables. For each group, we measured the prognostic capacity and the predictive ability for 6-year disability. ResultsThe analysis showed a physical cluster (including weight loss, reduced grip strength/gait speed/physical activity, impaired balance, environmental barriers) and a psychosocial cluster (e.g. living alone, depression, low income). Thus, participants were classified into four groups according to the presence of a physical and/or psychosocial cluster. Compared with the fit group, the relative risks of becoming disabled in the physical, psychosocial and mixed deficit groups were 2.23 (95% CI 0.71-7.00), 1.52 (95% CI 0.62-3.75) and 6.37 (95% CI 2.83-14.33), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for the physical, psychosocial and mixed deficit groups were, respectively, 9% and 87%, 6% and 83%, and 27% and 94%. ConclusionsAs expected, physical and psychosocial deficits cluster predominantly into different groups. Even when both are considered simultaneously, the ability to predict incident disability is still insufficient. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 685-691
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/11677
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact