NTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node detection is a surgical procedure that allow to avoid systematic lymphadenectomy in those tumors in early stage where lymph node spread is not sure. If the sentinel lymph node is not involved by tumor in 98-99% of case other lymph nodes are clean. The reason why less radical surgery is chosen is linked to the lower postoperative morbidity rate, the risk of lower limb lymphedema decreases. The aim of this review was to summarize what is the state of art of using the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLD) technique and what are the future goals to improve the safety and the reliability. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We have conducted a review of the literature of the past 10 years to understand the attitudes of oncologist gynecologists in the world to the conservative treatment of cervical cancer. We only selected articles from 2010 onwards, which meet the inclusion criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The detection rate varies from 83% to 100%. The bilateral detection rate, on the other hand, varies from 42% to 100%. The false negative rate ranges from 4% to 12%. Sensitivity varies from 20.7% (considering the frozen section) to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Indocyanine green is the most reliable and performing tracer for the search of the sentinel lymph node; that the false intraoperative negative rate is too high to be sure not to subject the patient to an incorrect therapeutic procedure; data concerning the safety and survival of conservative lymphadenectomy (SLND) compared to systematic lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature and therefore we are awaiting the results of the two ongoing randomized clinical trials that will allow us to have more significant scientific data.

Sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: a literature review on the use of conservative surgery techniques

Plotti F;Terranova C;Montera R;De Cicco Nardone C;Angioli R
2020-01-01

Abstract

NTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node detection is a surgical procedure that allow to avoid systematic lymphadenectomy in those tumors in early stage where lymph node spread is not sure. If the sentinel lymph node is not involved by tumor in 98-99% of case other lymph nodes are clean. The reason why less radical surgery is chosen is linked to the lower postoperative morbidity rate, the risk of lower limb lymphedema decreases. The aim of this review was to summarize what is the state of art of using the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLD) technique and what are the future goals to improve the safety and the reliability. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We have conducted a review of the literature of the past 10 years to understand the attitudes of oncologist gynecologists in the world to the conservative treatment of cervical cancer. We only selected articles from 2010 onwards, which meet the inclusion criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The detection rate varies from 83% to 100%. The bilateral detection rate, on the other hand, varies from 42% to 100%. The false negative rate ranges from 4% to 12%. Sensitivity varies from 20.7% (considering the frozen section) to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Indocyanine green is the most reliable and performing tracer for the search of the sentinel lymph node; that the false intraoperative negative rate is too high to be sure not to subject the patient to an incorrect therapeutic procedure; data concerning the safety and survival of conservative lymphadenectomy (SLND) compared to systematic lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature and therefore we are awaiting the results of the two ongoing randomized clinical trials that will allow us to have more significant scientific data.
2020
Uterine cervical neoplasms; Lymph node; Sentinel lymph node; Surgical procedures; operative; Indocyanine green
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12610/3374
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact